Center for Justice & Democracy News Release


For Release CONTACT: Geoff Boehm, Joanne Doroshow
September 26, 2003 212/267-2801

Med Mal Insurer Dumping States with Severe “Tort Reforms”:
More Evidence that Caps Do Not Work


As further proof that lawsuit limits, such as  caps, will not result in affordable insurance for doctors, Farmers Insurance Group announced this  week that it is pulling out of several states that have had longstanding caps and tort reforms in  place. In fact, Farmers, which is closing its medical malpractice line, has most of its  liability exposure in states that have had caps  and other severe “tort reforms” in place for years. 


“If there was ever any doubt that tort reform will  not solve doctors’ insurance problems, this should remove all doubt. One-third of Farmer’s  medical malpractice business is in California, which has had a severe $250,000 cap on damages  since the 1970s and is considered the ‘gold standard’ by insurance companies and organized  medicine. Farmers’ actions add to what has become mounting evidence that capping damages will  do nothing to keep insurers writing affordable policies for doctors,” said Geoff  Boehm, Legal Director of Center for Justice & Democracy.

In addition to a $250,000 cap on non-economic  damages that hasn’t been adjusted for inflation since it was imposed 28 years ago, California also  has limits on attorneys’ contingency fees, reductions of awards for collateral sources,  elimination of joint and several liability, and  periodic payments of future damages.

In fact, every one of the states where Farmers  says it had more than 10% market share – Hawaii, Idaho, Missouri and Oregon – have enacted numerous  “tort reforms” and all four capped damages in the 1980s. Oregon’s cap was found  unconstitutional in 1994, after being on the books for 7 years, but even Oregon has passed much  of the tort reformers’ agenda by taking away joint and several liability, reducing awards  for collateral sources, and limiting attorneys’ contingency fees in punitive damage cases.

Farmers’ pull-out of California comes shortly  after the second largest med mal insurer in that state, SCPIE, testified that caps and other  extreme “tort reforms” do not work. In their unsuccessful effort to get approval for a 15.6%  rate hike, SCPIE testified: “While MICRA was the legislature's attempt at remedying the medical  malpractice crisis in California in 1975, it did not substantially reduce the relative risk of  medical malpractice insurance in California.” “Lawmakers who want to improve the availability  and affordability of insurance for doctors will never succeed by taking away patients’ rights,”  said Center for Justice & Democracy Executive Director Joanne Doroshow. “The only way to help  doctors is by more strongly regulating the insurance industry.” 

The following is the list of principal “tort  reforms” enacted in states where Farmers has most medical malpractice liability exposures: California: (1/3 of Farmers’ med mal premiums): Cap on non-economic damages: 1975 Limits on contingency fees: 1975 Eliminated joint and several liability: 1986 Periodic payments of future damages: 1975 Repealed collateral source rule: 1975 Hawaii (Farmer’s largest market share--almost 24  percent):

Cap on pain & suffering damages: 1986
Limits on contingency fees: 1986
Restricted joint and several liability: 1986
Idaho (Over 10 percent of market):
Cap on non-economic damages, adjusted for 
inflation: 1987; cap lowered in 2003.
Restricted joint and several liability: 1987
Periodic payments: 1987
Repealed collateral source rule: 1990
Missouri (Over 10 percent of market):
Cap on non-economic damages, adjusted for 
inflation: 1986
Restricted joint and several liability: 1987
Repealed collateral source rule: 1987
Oregon (Over 10 percent of market):
Cap on non-economic damages: 1987, until ruled 
unconstitutional in 1994
Limits on contingency fees in punitive damage 
cases: 1995
Restricted joint and several liability: 1987; 
further restricted in 1995
Repealed collateral source rule: 1987
Eliminated punitive damage awards against health 
care providers: 1987

Return to Medical Malpractice