Reforms don't appease car insurers

Wednesday, February 19, 2003

By MARK PERKISS

 

TRENTON - Making it easier for auto insurance companies to reject applicants. Requiring carriers to give customers three coverage options with different price quotes. Making it easier to put poor drivers in more expensive, higher-risk pools.

Those are some of the provisions of a revised draft auto insurance reform bill being considered by lawmakers.

The draft legislation, which was obtained by The Times, was outlined by Gov. James E. McGreevey last month. The bill is an effort by the administration to help quell turmoil in New Jersey's insurance market, attract new companies and aid consumers who increasingly are having trouble finding coverage.

"If we're going to require people to have auto insurance, they have to be able to get it, and it has to be affordable," Banking and Insurance commissioner Holly Bakke said last month.

Insurance industry advocates say the bill as currently drafted does not go far enough to improve things for them. Consumer advocates say the proposal strikes the right balance.

Unlike past reform efforts, which focused mainly on trying to reduce rates for New Jersey drivers, which are among the highest in the country, the proposed legislation deals primarily with regulatory reforms on insurance companies.

Among the highlights of the revised bill are provisions phasing out New Jersey's "take all comers" rules by 2009 and reducing the number of motor vehicle points that companies need to declare people poor drivers and place them in more expensive, higher-risk pools.

Under the bill, instead of being forced to write policies for all but the worst drivers, companies who increase their business in set geographical areas by 5 percent next year would be able to turn people away.

The bill also allows insurers to place drivers in a higher-priced "substandard" category when they get four points on their license instead of the current six.

That provision, which fits with McGreevey's oft-stated goal that "Good drivers should not be paying for bad drivers," could lead to rate increases for about 250,000 drivers.

The bill requires insurers to offer customers three coverage options, each with different price quotes, and also requires them to notify customers when they request rate increases.

Those provisions have insurance industry advocates crying foul.

"If this bill passes as written, which I think is unlikely," it will present problems for companies, said John Tiene, president of the Insurance Council of New Jersey, an industry group. "It adds burdensome regulations to companies that already are under the most onerous regulations in the country."

Ernie Landante, a spokesman for the Coalition for Auto Insurance Competition, an industry group that helped write an earlier version of the bill, said the revised legislation is flawed because it does not ease New Jersey's restrictions on companies that want to leave the state.

"No company wants to do business where, if they can't make money or lose money, they are trapped like a caged animal," he said. "Changing that will tell outside insurers that this is an attractive state to do business in and that will attract them."

Pete Guzzo, director of Consumers for Civil Justice, praised the proposed legislation.

"I think what the governor has achieved is a good balance between the practical day-to-day business necessities of insurance companies and the rights of consumers for both adequate protection and benefits and reasonable cost," he said.

Guzzo said he was particularly pleased with provisions that require the Department of Banking and Insurance to rule on rate increase applications within 90 days. Currently companies complain that the department can take a year or longer to rule on rate requests.

"That's going to help companies by giving them some consistency, but it will also help consumers because it will do away with companies asking for 30 percent to 60 percent increases because the department has taken more than a year to decide on a smaller rate increase and now the company says it needs more," Guzzo said.

NOTE: Contact Mark Perkiss at mperkiss@njtimes.com or at (609) 943-5727.

Return to Medical Malpractice